What MFTs Need to Know

I just finished teaching a six-month training for Marriage and Family Therapists (MFTs) on Psychedelic-Informed Care, in collaboration with Sacramento Valley CAMFT. These trainings are needed for a simple reason: increasingly, the topic of psychedelics comes up in therapy sessions. Should I do it? Would it help? What are the risks? Can you help me think this through? This is why psychedelic-informed care for MFTs matters.

The fact is that, with a few exceptions, therapists are not trained to answer these questions. If psychedelics are discussed at all, it is usually in a psychopharmacology class as “drugs.” Very few programs address their healing potential, and even fewer teach clinicians how to work skillfully with clients who are curious about them, considering them, or trying to integrate an experience afterward.

As a result, many MFTs are clinically, ethically, and legally underprepared. We may feel curious, nervous, excited, skeptical, or unsure. And yet, the client is already there. Invited or uninvited, psychedelics are finding their way into the therapy hour.

This is why MFTs need to learn Psychedelic-Informed Care (PIC).

To be clear, PIC is not psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT). PAT refers to clinical work that includes administering a psychedelic substance within a legal, medical, or research structure.

Psychedelics may also come up through underground ceremonies, psychedelic tourism, ketamine clinics, religious practice, or solo use. Regardless of where the client’s interest originates, PIC provides licensed clinicians with tools to discuss, educate, reduce harm, clarify motivation and risk, and support integration, while respecting self-determination and avoiding the encouragement of illegal behavior.

In brief, PIC helps therapists help clients think clearly, make informed decisions, and integrate psychedelic experiences while remaining ethically and legally grounded.

Base Camp, Not Sherpa 1

A useful metaphor for the MFT’s role is that of the Sherpa and the base camp. The Sherpa helps the client climb the mountain. That is not our role. Our job is not to dose, source, guide, or facilitate the psychedelic session. We are base camp: a stable place where clients can prepare thoughtfully, assess risk honestly, and return when the experience needs integration, or if something goes wrong.

This is not a small role. Clients do not need us to be enthusiastic cheerleaders or frightened gatekeepers. An acronym I developed to explain this is that PIC therapists listen to WCIG. We must be:

  • Warm enough that clients tell the truth.
  • Curious enough not to impose our agenda.
  • Informed enough not to minimize risk.
  • Grounded enough not to cross legal or ethical boundaries.

Some questions clients often ask:

“Should I Do It?”

When a client asks whether they should use a psychedelic, the temptation is to answer too quickly. But underneath one question, there are often deeper ones: Can you help me? Will you reject me? Can you hold my uncertainty? Aware of the power differential, we must be careful not to lead the client in either direction. Instead, we can welcome the conversation without judgment and help them explore their assumptions, alternatives, motivations, and risks.

“What Are the Risks?”

MFTs do not need to become physicians, pharmacologists, or attorneys to be helpful. Still, we need enough literacy to know when something may be risky and when to consult or refer. Clinician and educator Kristina Hunter offers a useful concept here: the three mirrors: body, mind, and life context.

  • The body: medical issues, medications, substance interactions, cardiac concerns, pregnancy, neurological factors.
  • The mind: history of psychosis, mania, severe dissociation, suicidality, or current crisis. Is the client sufficiently resourced to handle intense material?
  • The life context: housing stability, relational support, time to recover. Or isolation, impulsivity, secrecy, and the hope that one experience will fix everything.

We should not medically clear clients or encourage use, even if we think it might help. We are helping them think more honestly and, when warranted, inviting them to discuss medical concerns with a qualified professional. And although we should not tell clients what to do, it is part of our duty of care to name our clinical concerns.

“Can You Assist Me?”

A client may ask for our involvement in many ways: “I’d feel safer if you were there.” “Can you talk to the underground guide?” “Can you help me figure out how much to take?” These requests may express attachment needs, fear, hope, or trust and should be explored rather than dismissed. But they also require boundaries.

We must clearly separate preparation and harm reduction, exploring intention, expectations, support systems, and aftercare, from facilitation, dose coaching, procurement, or participation in an unregulated session. The latter falls outside our role and can move dangerously close to ethical and legal transgressions. Being clear about this protects the client, the therapist, and the profession.

The Morning After

Clients may show up the following week and report that they used psychedelics over the weekend and now want, or desperately need, to process the experience. When things go well, they return inspired, tender, and full of insights to propel therapy forward. Other times they return confused, inflated, ashamed, or dysregulated. “I saw God.” “I think I remembered a trauma.” “I haven’t slept for two days.”

Integration is not about forcing the experience into a neat clinical interpretation. It is the slow, vital process of helping raw experience become embodied, relational, and livable, turning psychedelic states into psychological traits.

Sometimes this means supporting meaning-making. Other times, it means grounding or assessing whether consultation, psychiatric evaluation, or medical intervention is required. This is not always easy. Separating a spiritual emergency from a psychotic break requires real care and expertise. Psychedelics do not exempt us from ordinary duty-of-care responsibilities. Safety always comes first. Do not hesitate to reach out for support when needed.

Why PIC Matters for MFTs

MFTs understand relationships, systems, attachment, trauma, and the complicated ways people change and resist change. Psychedelic experiences may open doors, but clients still have to walk through them in real life, with partners, children, parents, and responsibilities.

Every therapist working in this area should be able to say clearly what they do and do not do. Our role is to provide PIC, not PAT: to help clients explore motivations, risks, expectations, meaning, and integration, while avoiding providing, recommending, sourcing, or facilitating psychedelic use.

The psychedelic landscape is changing quickly. Laws differ by jurisdiction, research findings keep emerging, and public enthusiasm often outpaces regulation and training. We need more than opinions. We need ethical steadiness, clinical humility, and a robust consultation network. Part of our role is to help clients separate hype from reality.

As I have said elsewhere, even for experienced guides, psychedelics are terra incognita. Old maps used to warn us that there may be dragons out there. Psychedelics can be powerful, healing, destabilizing, and sacred, sometimes all at once. We need to be prepared.

Psychedelics do not make therapy irrelevant or outdated. They can amplify our impact on a client’s healing process. Our training gives us a reliable compass to keep clients safe within ethical and legal boundaries, helping them think, prepare, integrate, and stay connected to themselves and their relationships. By maintaining solid boundaries, we can support the client’s journey without losing our own way.


I offer talks, workshops, and consultation for MFTs, clinicians, and organizations navigating Psychedelic-Informed Care, integration, ethics, boundaries, and clinical risk.


  1. A note on language: Sherpa refers both to an Indigenous Himalayan ethnic group and, in common usage, to a profession associated with high-altitude mountain guidance. I use the term here in the latter way, with respect and awareness of both meanings. ↩︎

On the numinous quality of psychedelic work, and why awe and humility belong together.

Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy Essentials | Part 3

In the previous articles in this series, I suggested that psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) is not a walk in the park. Old maps warned travelers with the phrase hic sunt dracones, here be dragons. It was a warning suggesting that beyond this point, the map becomes uncertain. Beware. Do not assume you know what you are entering.

That warning applies to psychedelic work.

Psychedelics open fascinating possibilities for healing, insight, grief, forgiveness, and spiritual meaning. They can help people encounter parts of themselves that have been exiled for years, soften rigid defenses, bring forgotten memories into awareness, and reconnect with something larger than the isolated self.

But fascination alone is not enough.

The theologian Rudolf Otto used the phrase mysterium tremendum et fascinans to describe the numinous: that which is simultaneously mysterious, awe-inspiring, frightening, and deeply attractive. This applies to psychedelic work. Often, before a ceremony, people feel both fear and curiosity. This is fitting. Something in us is drawn toward it, while something else trembles before it.

In many ways, psychedelics are like fire. Fire warms us, feeds us, protects us, and illuminates darkness. Around fire, stories are told, meals are shared, rituals are held, and communities are formed. And yet, we remain cautious around it. We do not assume that because fire is good, more fire is always better. We do not hand a torch to someone without preparation. Fire requires knowledge, respect, containment, and care.

Psychedelics do too.

The dragon is also a fitting image. Dragons are powerful, mysterious, unpredictable, and often guard treasures. In many stories, the task is not simply to defeat the dragon but to become worthy of the encounter.

The psychedelic renaissance is full of promise, but also of peril. We may reduce psychedelics to techniques, experiences, or shortcuts. We may oversell them as miracle cures. We may even assume that, since they can bestow so many blessings, nothing can go wrong.

That is simply not the case.

Psychedelics are not silver bullets. They won’t solve our problems for us. In some Indigenous traditions, natural psychedelics are referred to as plant teachers. This makes sense. Good teachers show what needs to be done, but do not do it for us. They reveal, challenge, support, and sometimes confront us.

We still must do the heavy lifting.

This is one of the great misreadings of PAT. Many want to believe that the substance will eliminate their problems just like paracetamol eliminates a headache. But there is more to this story. Psychedelics can make healing more possible. They open the door, but we still have to walk through it.

We may experience unconditional love, but then have to learn how to live from it. A painful memory may be recovered, but still needs to be integrated. A mystical experience may occur, but must be understood without inflation. Insight is not transformation. As Ken Wilber suggests, we need to convert altered states into permanent traits.

This is why preparation and integration are fundamental, not as annoying add-ons, but as part of the work itself. The experience is never separate from the container that holds it. The medicine should not be separated from the person’s mindset, the relationship with the guide, the setting, the boundaries, and the commitment to growth.

The fire needs tending. The dragon asks us to become deserving of the boon.

Enthusiasm without humility can lead to carelessness, inflated claims, naïve expectations, poor boundaries, and even harm to the very people seeking healing. A mature approach must hold awe and discernment together. Awe reminds us that something profound may be taking place. Discernment reminds us that fireworks do not mean healing. Fascination opens the heart. Responsibility keeps the feet on the ground.

Training is crucial.

Psychedelic practitioners require more than information; they require formation. The person preparing, guiding, and integrating these experiences needs more than technical knowledge. They need maturity, self-awareness, ethical clarity, relational skill, cultural humility, and the ability to remain steady when the unexpected appears.

We cannot truly tame the dragon, but we can learn how to work with it. We can approach it, listen to it, respect it, and join forces with it wisely. Not as master, worshipper, or conqueror, but as an ally.

The field does not need hype, panic, dismissal, blind devotion, or pollyannish naïveté, but a grounded orientation. PAT has enormous potential. But if we want this renaissance to mature, we need to remember that what can heal can also harm. We need maps, training, ethics, cultural respect, and honest conversations about risk.

The dragon usually guards a treasure. But it is not given gratuitously. It asks to be approached with humility, preparation, and respect.

Next: Experience Is Not Healing. On why powerful psychedelic experiences do not automatically become transformation.

Want grounded preparation or integration support?
I offer a careful space to explore intention, readiness, meaning, and next steps with discernment and respect. Book a Free 15-Min Fit Call

Part of the raw musings of a psychotherapist

The Buddha proclaimed that there is no self. Buddhism encourages us to realize that our sense of who we are is an empty construction. There’s even a Ram Dass film called Becoming Nobody.

In contrast, the West wants us to become somebody. That is, to develop a cohesive, functional self, capable of setting boundaries, regulating affect, relating, and working well.

Today I want to focus on the Western side of this equation; on something I habitually see in therapy, though it is often hard to spot: the fear of not existing, which has nothing to do with the Buddhist no-self.

It sounds kind of weird, doesn’t it? Like something out of a fairy tale. Alice fearing that she might be nothing but some sort of figure in the Red King’s dream. But this is no fantasy.

Have you ever met someone constantly needing to be acknowledged or even admired? I’m sure you have. We may even be among them! Some find ways to get it through legitimate means. They find a platform that provides much-needed validation: performing, teaching, helping, creating… Others look for it, or even demand it, from those around them: parents, partners, children, co-workers, lovers…

I often meet them in therapy when their loved ones grow tired of having to prop them up, or, for the most successful among them, when they realize that all the fame, adulation, and acknowledgment are never enough to fill what feels like a hole within.

It is tempting to label them as narcissistic, and some may be, but when we dig deeper, we often find a deeply wounded and scared person facing an unbearable emptiness. A dread that, no matter how successful, funny, accomplished, or accommodating they are, they don’t matter. They feel unsubstantial, lacking matter. Nobody really cares. They could cease to exist, and nobody would even notice.

Although rarely articulated, they seem to fear that, if not noticed, they could dissolve like a dream upon awakening. To be clear, they don’t fear they would literally fade away; but a strange compulsion keeps them demanding attention because the alternative terrifies them.

How can this be?

Psychologically, we develop our sense of being real in relationship. Early on, we need to be seen, recognized, and responded to, not as stars, but simply as beings whose feelings, presence, and existence register in someone else’s mind. This is why young children yell things like, “Look, Mom, no hands!”

When that recognition (known as mirroring) is reliable enough, a person slowly develops an inner sense of solidity: I am here. I count. I remain myself even when no one is looking. But when that kind of acknowledgment is missing, inconsistent, or conditional, the person may continue to depend on outer confirmation to feel real. Then, being noticed starts to feel less like a satisfaction and more like a necessity.

That is why, for some, the hunger to be seen carries such desperation. What they are really fighting is not anonymity, but the old terror of feeling expendable, forgettable, irrelevant, as if they had no psychological weight. In milder forms, this manifests as shame, emptiness, or a chronic sense of not being important. In more serious forms, it feels like a threat to existence itself: If I do not register anywhere, if nobody notices me, do I even exist?

To put it simply, the fear of not mattering can devolve into something primal: the fear of not being, of becoming nothing in the eyes of others and, finally, in one’s own.

How can therapy help?

In a therapeutic relationship, a good-enough therapist offers a new kind of experience: one of being truly seen, perhaps for the first time. Over time, as the client is met by someone who notices them, takes them seriously, and does not reduce them to performance, usefulness, or image, they begin to internalize a steadier sense of being real.

They no longer need quite so much external proof to feel that they exist, count, and have weight. The therapist may also help them develop ways to self-validate, with affirmations such as: “I matter,” “Even when nobody is there, my existence matters,” or, if they are spiritually oriented, “I matter because God sees me, loves me, and cares about me.1

It is interesting that, in psychedelic sessions, a recurrent insight is precisely how significant we are, how much we are loved, and how trivial our daily struggles can be. We learn that we are bigger, brighter, and more amazing than we can ever conceive.

Back to the Buddha.

So, should we build the self or see through its illusory nature? Do we matter, or are we empty? As often happens in therapy, the answer is both/and. Jack Engler famously said, “You have to become somebody before you can become nobody.”

Most Western psychotherapy focuses on helping people function in this material world. A healthy ego helps us remember where we parked the car, our Social Security number, and to pay our taxes. Eastern traditions aim toward liberation, toward becoming free from the limitations and illusions of this same world. Their goal is to go beyond the ego. But that’s a topic for a future article.

If you often feel like you need people’s acknowledgment, or if you have been accused of being too needy, insecure, or self-centered, you may have lacked the mirroring every single one of us needs. The good news is that this can be healed.

Remember that you matter and you are loved (and that you should not take yourself too seriously). If you are struggling, therapy can help you heal the fear of being inconsequential and free yourself from the harmful patterns that keep you from seeing who you really are.

0 – 0 – 0 – 0 – 0

Tired of needing others to prove that you matter? If you often feel unseen, too needy, or dependent on others’ acknowledgment to feel real, therapy can help you build a steadier sense of self.
Contact me or Book a Free 15-Min Fit Call

  1. However, it is worth noting that such affirmations alone won’t be enough if the wound from early childhood runs deep, as often happens in these cases. ↩︎

Psychiatrists are key players and need to stay informed.

Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy Essentials | Part 2

Psychiatrists do not need to support psychedelics. Still, it may be wise to pay attention. The zeitgeist is changing and, soon, if not already, patients will begin asking about them or even stopping their SSRIs in search of a miracle cure. The well-being of patients may depend, in part, on their psychiatrist’s understanding of these historically controversial substances.

To be clear, psychedelics are not the miracle cure the media sometimes announces. However, they have re-entered serious clinical and scientific conversation. Professional psychiatric bodies in the United States1, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand are all taking the field seriously. The American Psychiatric Association supports continued research while withholding endorsement for routine clinical use outside approved investigational settings. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists has issued guidance specifically to inform psychiatrists about the potential therapeutic utility of these substances2. The UK Royal College of Psychiatrists has gone further and stated that psychiatrists should be involved in their future therapeutic use and in the clinical leadership of multidisciplinary teams3.

Why should psychiatrists care?

First, patients are increasingly hearing about psychedelics and their potential healing value. As their psychiatrist, you may be the one professional your patients trust most. It is only natural that they may turn to you to make sense of this landscape. What would you say when a patient asks whether psychedelics could help with treatment-resistant depression, or when they ask for your opinion about the Costa Rica retreat they just booked? This is your opportunity to discuss risks, expectations, medication interactions, and contraindications. When the stakes are high, knowing how to respond or who to refer to becomes a form of care.

Second, the research is no longer peripheral. Major psychiatry journals and organizations are engaging the topic seriously. The British Journal of Psychiatry has published guidance and reflections to support psychiatrists as this area evolves. Likewise, in the United States, the APA has issued a Position Statement on the Use of Psychedelic and Empathogenic Agents4. Although the matter is far from settled, the subject has matured enough that informed clinicians can no longer dismiss it as fringe, especially when suffering patients are paying attention.

Third, people interested in using psychedelics need the involvement of their psychiatrists. This area of mental health care should not develop without psychiatric input. Guides, therapists, sitters, and ceremonial practitioners may all benefit from psychiatric expertise. Psychiatrists are especially well-positioned to contribute diagnostic clarity, assessment of comorbidity, medication expertise, adverse-effect monitoring, contraindication screening, harm reduction, and continuity of care.

This matters because psychedelic-assisted therapy is no longer confined to underground or countercultural spaces, and more people are willing to try it to address issues such as depression, anxiety, PTSD, OCD, and fear of death. However, as suggested earlier in this series, what can heal can also harm. That is why psychiatry should join the conversation. Not simply to approve or disapprove, but to bring clinical judgment, patient protection, and a broader view of care to an area that needs all three. The opportunity here is not only for psychiatrists to stay current. It is also for them to better support patients who are curious, hopeful, cautious, or already walking into this territory.

Over the years, I’ve worked with many caring psychiatrists who, while aware of the risks, also recognized the potential benefits of psychedelics and helped make ceremonies safer and more healing. Sadly, I’ve also been called to support people in the aftermath of experiences they pursued on their own, sometimes because they felt they had no place to discuss the issue openly. Of course, patients are responsible for their own decisions, but having informed professionals in their corner can make a huge difference.

Psychiatrists do not need to slay, dismiss, or fear the dragon. But they cannot ignore it either. What is needed is engagement and a better understanding of the territory, if only because more patients are already looking in that direction. Your patients are counting on you.

Next: Fire and the Dragon. On the numinous quality of psychedelic work, and why awe and humility belong together.

If you are a psychiatrist, clinic, or training program curious about this topic, follow this series or reach out for a grounded talk, consultation, or educational offering on the subject.


  1. https://www.psychiatry.org/News-room/News-Releases/Special-Issue-APA-Journal-Psychedelic-Medication ↩︎
  2. https://www.ranzcp.org/getmedia/4cfd1fea-171c-43fc-8dab-7b476b3f706c/cm-therapeutic-use-of-psychedelics.pdf ↩︎
  3. https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/docs/default-source/improving-care/better-mh-policy/position-statements/position-statement—ps02_25-pars-for-medical-use.pdf ↩︎
  4. https://www.psychiatry.org/getattachment/d5c13619-ca1f-491f-a7a8-b7141c800904/Position-Use-of-Psychedelic-Empathogenic-Agents.pdf ↩︎

Why psychedelic work calls for humility, preparation, and respect.

Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy Essentials | Part 1

Psychedelic-assisted therapy is often discussed in terms of promise. And rightly so. For many people, it has opened doors that had long seemed sealed shut. It has helped illuminate buried pain, soften rigid patterns, and reconnect people with meaning, wonder, and life itself.

And yet, this promise can be misleading if it is not held alongside another truth: this work is not easy terrain.

As beneficial as it can be, psychedelic-assisted therapy, or PAT, can also be arduous, perilous, and thorny. The same processes that may support healing can also become destabilizing when approached without adequate preparation, support, or discernment. This is one of the reasons I find the old phrase hic sunt dracones so fitting here: here be dragons.

The point of such a warning is not to frighten people away. It is to invite seriousness. It is to remind us that there are forms of terrain we do not cross casually. Just as one would prepare carefully before entering difficult and unfamiliar terrain, deep preparation, respect for the journey ahead, and trustworthy guides are strongly recommended here as well.

Psychedelics can be profound teachers, but they are not a shortcut. They are not a silver bullet. They do not do our growing for us. At their best, they may help reveal what is true, loosen what has hardened, and open a path. But what happens next depends on many things: the participant’s readiness, the quality of preparation, the guide’s skill and maturity, the relational container, and the care taken to integrate what emerges.

This is why I often compare psychedelics to fire, or perhaps to a dragon. They are fascinating, powerful, and never fully tamed. One does not truly master fire. One learns how to work with it, how to respect it, and how not to be careless in its presence. The same is true here.

If this field is to mature, it will not do so through enthusiasm or good intentions alone. It will require humility, ethical clarity, thoughtful training, cultural respect, and a willingness to move more slowly than the hype might prefer. It will require us to remember that healing is not manufactured by intensity alone, and that deep work deserves deep preparation.

There is much to be hopeful about. I hold that hope. I have seen the healing psychedelics can support. But hope, by itself, is not enough. In a field like this, reverence must be accompanied by responsibility.

Perhaps that is one simple way of saying what this series is about: to prepare, to learn how to approach the dragon wisely, and to remain mindful of its unpredictable nature.

Next: Psychiatry and Psychotherapy on why we need psychiatrists to be part of this quest to the dragon.

Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy Essentials Series

An introduction to the Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy Essentials series

Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy (PAT) carries real promise. It also asks a great deal of everyone involved.

This is not a walk in the park. As beneficial as it can be, and research continues to suggest that it can be, the path can also be arduous, perilous, and thorny. Old maps warned travelers with the phrase hic sunt dracones—here be dragons. That image feels fitting here. Psychedelics can open doors to healing, insight, and transformation, but without adequate preparation, guidance, and integration, the same processes that may help can also harm.

This series is meant as a grounded orientation to PAT: what it is, what it is not, what makes it helpful, and what makes it risky. We will explore some of its core elements: set and setting, the medicine, intention, preparation, the guide, the participant, and integration; as well as the wider questions that surround them: ethics, relationship, culture, spirituality, and the humility this work requires.

To borrow a phrase from Rudolf Otto, psychedelics are a mysterium tremendum et fascinans; both fascinating and daunting. In that sense, they are a bit like fire, or perhaps a dragon: powerful, compelling, and never fully tamed. We do not master them so much as learn, with care and respect, how to work with them wisely. You can choose to befriend or confront a dragon; it will certainly impact your journey.

I write these reflections not as a detached observer, but as someone who has spent many years studying, teaching, and participating in this evolving landscape. My hope is simple: to serve as your guide, someone who knows the terrain, who can help you explore it more safely, point out what matters, and warn of the perils, so the path may feel clearer and steadier.

If you are new to this work, welcome. If you have been walking this path for some time, welcome as well. Either way, I hope these writings offer something useful for the journey.

Begin with: Here Be Dragons — why psychedelic-assisted therapy requires humility, preparation, and respect.

Register to stay informed of new articles, lectures, and updates.

While preparing a series of talks on Shamanism, I gathered a few reflections that gradually shaped themselves into something beautiful. I share them humbly and with no claim of ownership, trusting they may resonate with you:

Sink your roots with reverence into the Earth. To wound nature is to wound yourself (Haudenosaunee)

Attend to Grandfather Fire; he teaches those who wish to learn (Wixárika Huichol)

Let the great sea set you in motion; be carried trembling with joy (Netsilik Inuit)

***

Learn patiently from the plants; wisdom grows through discipline (Payé)

Hear the medicine speak; it reveals what is hidden (Mazatec)

Everything has its own song; listen until rocks and colors sing (Lakota)

***

Seek solitude; deep wisdom grows far from the noise of men (Caribou Inuit)

Find your inner light; let it guide you through the dark (Iglulik Inuit)

Understand your own madness; then the spirit world will not carry you away (Chontal)

***

Release your personal history; let go of the past that blocks your growth (Mochica)

Enter the places of fright and terror; truth often waits there (Mazatec)

Take responsibility for your health; neglect prevents healing (Aztec)

***

Look into the body like clear water; seek the truth beneath the sickness (Jívaro)

Know that heart heals heart; the strongest medicine is the desire to serve (Lakota)

Attend to the silence; songs are born there like bubbles rising to the air (Little Diomede)

***

Recognize that healing restores the balance of the community (Dagara)

Stay close in danger; do not separate on the paths of the wind (Wixárika Huichol)

Understand that I am you and you are me; everything in life is connected (Maya)

***

Thank the ancestors and the medicine; gratitude keeps the world in balance (Wixárika Huichol)

Know your place in the sacred hoop; every being is your relative (Oglala Lakota)

***

Guard your words; harmful words are shadows that lead you astray (Lakota)

Make your life a worthy offering; ask nothing in return for healing (Lakota)

Realize that each of us already carries the Great Medicine (Aztec)

***

Move in balance and harmony along the sacred Red Road (Lakota)

Walk in wonder; the world is alive and listening (Wixárika Huichol)

***

Trust what is greater than you; the sacred is never exhausted (Caribou Inuit)

Stand humbly like a child before the endless mystery (Wixárika Huichol)

Collected by Sergio Rodriguez-Castillo from traditional indigenous teachings worldwide

These teachings are shared with respect. Because many of the original voices are anonymous, I’ve listed only the cultural traditions from which these lines were collected, rather than attributing them to specific individuals. This post is offered as an invitation to reflection, not as a substitute for cultural context, lived relationship, or community-held knowledge.

Why California LMFTs need psychedelic-informed care1

The relationship between psychedelics and psychotherapy has always been… complicated. In the late 50s and early 60s, LSD was distributed to mental health professionals to explore its therapeutic potential. Sandoz suspected there was something there, but couldn’t quite pin down where it fit. When Tim Leary later “discovered” psilocybin mushrooms, he framed them as psychologically significant. MAPS, from the beginning, assumed therapists would be at the bedside for MDMA experiences. With the 70s, prohibition made the relationship illegal, but it didn’t make it disappear. Many clinicians simply went underground.

Now, in the current psychedelic renaissance, while most psychedelics remain illegal, mental health professionals face a familiar dilemma: how do we support clients without stepping outside legal and ethical boundaries?

With support from CAMFT Sacramento Valley, I’m teaching a six-session series on Psychedelic-Informed Care (PIC)—how clinicians can respond when psychedelics enter the therapy room without fueling hype or reinforcing taboo. Should we lean in? Set boundaries (which ones)? Redirect? The series is designed to help you answer those questions with precision.

The topic will show up.

It arrives in many forms: questions about legality, reactions to a news story, curiosity about a ketamine clinic, plans for a retreat abroad. “Would you recommend it?” “What are the risks?” “Would microdosing help?” And, of course, the therapist’s favorite: “Is it true it’s five years of therapy in one night?” Clients are often confused, and they want orientation from someone they trust—you.

De-mystification

Right now there’s cultural noise, mixed messages, and outright misinformation. As clinicians, we don’t need to endorse or condemn. We need to help clients differentiate—between curiosity and compulsion, hope and inflation, meaningful experience and destabilizing aftermath. PIC begins with demystification: separating evidence from hype, and myth from clinical reality.

The legal landscape patchwork

Part of the surge is legal ambiguity. The picture is no longer a single, clear “no.” It’s a mixed bag: regulated access models in some places, research pathways, tightly controlled international frameworks, religious-use carve-outs, and—closer to home—local reforms and “decriminalization” language.

Even in California, where classic psychedelics remain illegal, several jurisdictions have deprioritized enforcement around entheogenic “plant medicine” (including places like San Francisco, Oakland, and Santa Cruz). But deprioritization is not legalization. It doesn’t change state or federal controlled-substance law—and it doesn’t change LMFT scope.

Why psychedelics? Why now?

The “why now” isn’t mysterious. Psychological suffering keeps rising, and so does the hunger for new solutions (especially when many mainstream antidepressants remain variations on monoamine modulation). Add promising research signals, a primed cultural zeitgeist, and media acceleration—and you get momentum.

But when a society is suffering and hungry for relief, it becomes vulnerable to shortcuts. Psychedelics, when framed as shortcuts, become especially seductive.

Potential benefits—and real risks

It’s hard to deny that psychedelic research is promising. Across trials at different stages, psychedelics have shown potential relevance for trauma-related suffering, depression and anxiety, existential distress and end-of-life fear, relational patterns, and spiritual meaning-making.

At the same time, potential benefits are not guaranteed, and they are not risk-free. Alongside positive outcomes are reports of harm: destabilization and disorientation after experiences, inflation, bypassing, aftercare gaps (no containment, no follow-up, no integration), and boundary/exploitation risks—especially in unregulated contexts.

This isn’t fear-mongering. It’s clinical realism. The psychedelic ecosystem is still maturing. Ethical failures occur. And when they do, the cleanup often lands back in traditional therapy.

So where do LMFTs stand?

Every clinician know to keep this distinction front and center: scope of practice is what California law authorizes; scope of competence is what you personally are trained to do safely.

California’s LMFT scope includes assessing and treating substance use and related mental/behavioral concerns, and explicitly includes client education, consultation, and clinical case management. But legal permission does not equal clinical readiness, and clinical readiness does not grant legal permission. In plain language: just because you can talk about psychedelics doesn’t mean you should, unless you have the training.

PAT vs. PIC (and the underground)

To stay grounded, it helps to separate three different situations:

  • Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy (PAT): administration plus a protocolized, regulated setting.
  • Psychedelic-Informed Care (PIC): what LMFTs can do ethically—discuss, educate, harm-reduce, integrate.
  • Underground work: unregulated and often illegal “guided” psychedelic work, with wide variability in competence and ethics.

Here’s the key takeaway: to remain within ethical and legal grounds, LMFTs must stay in the green zone—discussion, education, case management, referrals (for education, not sourcing) and integration—and avoid the red zone: using, offering, facilitating/administering, or coaching sourcing/dosing for illegal substances. Yes, there are yellow areas and nuance. But clarity protects clients and therapists alike.

Your stance matters

Beyond scope, not every therapist feels the same about psychedelics—and that’s okay. Within professional boundaries, there’s a spectrum of reasonable stances: cautious, curious-but-boundaried, harm-reduction oriented, or integration-focused. The goal isn’t ideological alignment. The goal is ethical, competent care.

The PIC toolkit

PIC is practical. It boils down to three skill areas:

  1. Psychoeducation (balanced, reality-based, myth-correcting)
  2. Preparation (scope-appropriate: intentions, supports, safety planning, consult triggers—without “how-to”)
  3. Integration (meaning-making, relational repair, values-to-action, stabilization)

A simple response flow helps: Discuss → Educate → Harm-reduce → Integrate. If you can remember that loop, you can respond with confidence even when the topic is charged.

And it should go without saying, but it doesn’t: documentation is your shield. When psychedelics come up, chart the discussion, state client goals, document boundaries, note risks reviewed, and record consults/referrals. That’s not bureaucracy—it’s ethical self-respect and license protection.

In closing: your license gives you a clear road to walk with clients, and a reliable compass to stay oriented—so you can support their journey without losing your way.

In future sessions, we’ll cover the state of the art (research/legal/ethics), cultural context and humility, what to do when the client brings it up, what to do when things go sideways, and—finally—a clear vision of the LMFT’s role in the psychedelic landscape.

Now you know. If you have questions or want to explore this topic further, feel free to contact me.

  1. Although many of these principles apply to all LMFTs, note that this article focuses in California law. ↩︎

Clients are bringing psychedelic questions and experiences to therapy. This six-part series gives LMFTs a clinically grounded, culturally informed approach to discussing psychedelics within scope—with tools for education, harm reduction, and integration. It is not a “how to do PAT” course. You’ll learn the current research/ethics/legal context (incl. religious-use carve-outs), cultural considerations, and concrete safeguards around risk and boundaries. Clinicians will leave with clear language for discussing benefits/risks and integration interventions.

Sessions (at a glance – click link for details):

*Please note that you have to register individually for each session

*Education and integration within LMFT scope; no sourcing or dosing guidance.

About fifteen years ago, whenever someone invited me to talk about the healing value of meditation, I would start—somewhat mischievously—by saying, “If you’re still wondering whether meditation is healing, you haven’t been paying attention. Its benefits have been proven beyond reasonable doubt.” Even with today’s ever-growing body of research pointing strongly in that direction, when it comes to psychedelics, we’re not there yet.

Psychedelics are being explored for a wide array of purposes: fibromyalgia, dementia, brain injury, Parkinson’s, ALS, Alzheimer’s, and chronic pain. More specifically in mental health (which will be our focus): anxiety, PTSD, depression, anorexia, alcohol and substance use, eating disorders, OCD, bipolar II, smoking, and existential distress. Researchers clearly suspect that these substances hold significant potential across many conditions1.

Not “what”, But “How”.

Although “What can psychedelics heal?” is an important question, there’s another one that’s not asked as often: How do they heal?

Of course, a neuroscientist could answer that psychedelics temporarily loosen rigid brain networks and boost neural plasticity by binding to serotonin receptors—creating a window to reconfigure entrenched pathways into new, more adaptive patterns.

However, I am not a neuroscientist, and I am not sure how many of my readers are, so let’s take a different route.  If we look beyond the brain into current research and what I’ve observed with clients, growing evidence shows that psychedelics and psychotherapy heal through the same core mechanisms—the difference being intensity, not kind. Integrated wisely, each strengthens and completes the other. Let’s unpack it:

Beyond neuropsychological explanations, there are several theories that try to explain the mechanisms involved in psychedelic healing:

  • Set & setting: Mindset, expectations, the quality of the relationship, and the surrounding environment shape and enhance the healing potential of the experience.
  • Network reset: Psychedelics disrupt entrenched neural patterns—and the fixed beliefs they sustain—promoting neural flexibility and the restructuring of pathways.
  • Receptivity: Heightened openness and reduced defensiveness allow for deep exploration, insight, and the learning and retention of new ways of being.
  • Cognitive updating: By widening perspective, old organizing principles are revised into more adaptive meanings, greater agency, and healthier narratives.
  • Emotional release/catharsis: By relaxing the brain’s control systems within a safe relational container, traumatic memories, repressed emotions, and somatic tension trapped in the body can surface, to be completed or reconfigured in an improved emotional context.
  • Mystical insight and self-transcendence: The sense of self expands beyond the wounded ego, merging or identifying with a larger Self or Cosmos, offering a broader perspective and reducing existential fear.

While painted with broad strokes, these ideas form the backbone of how many researchers now understand psychedelic healing.

So, there you have it. That’s how they heal. Now we know… or do we?

Let’s explore it a bit longer. These theories are elegant and plausible, but much of the research is still young. Serious scientific study has only recently resumed, and since the only way to know what’s happening inside someone’s mind is to ask them, researchers usually rely on questionnaires and interviews to access participants’ inner worlds.

Let’s try another approach. Since we already know that psychotherapy works (trust me on that, okay?2), let’s explore how it brings about change and see if we can find some parallels.

How Therapy Works

Even before Freud, this question has been heatedly debated3.  Although we don’t have a definitive answer, decades of research have produced a set of “common factors” that play a part in healing4:

  • A reasonable expectation that therapy, through specific methods, will actually work.
  • A meaningful, safe relationship where the client feels seen, accepted, and understood.
  • The facing, correction, and integration of painful or unresolved emotional experiences, often—but not necessarily- linked to childhood.
  • Insight, meaning-making, and the creation of new personal narratives.
  • Updating of rigid beliefs and practicing new behaviors and ways of thinking.
  • Development of accountability, agency, and self-efficacy.
  • Desidentification beyond limiting self-stories and an expansion of the sense of self.

Although the language differs, it’s easy to spot the parallels. Both emphasize the importance of the relationship (part of the setting), the value of positive expectations (part of the mindset), and the opportunity to face and correct painful past experiences, often through emotional release. Both emphasize insights, updated beliefs, the chance to create new narratives, try new behaviors, expand perspectives, and reclaim agency.

It seems that what helps people change in therapy may be the very same processes at work in psychedelic healing. This would also explain the popular meme that psychedelics are like three (or five, or even ten) years of therapy in one night. But if that were true, why would anyone choose psychotherapy at all?

Old Habits Die Hard

Good question. First, psychedelics are still illegal in most of the world. But even setting legality aside, this isn’t really about choosing one over the other—it’s about understanding their respective strengths and limitations.

The “three years in one night” meme captures only part of the truth. There’s more to it. Over decades, psychotherapists have learned that change is hard. We cling to old—even painful—ways of being. Old beliefs, like habits, die hard.

Psychedelics are intriguing because they seem to produce immediate results. I often hear a version of the meme. This may stem from heightened receptivity, intense emotional release, and powerful, luminous insights—often mystical in nature—that appear to open a broad window of neural plasticity. Psychotherapy, on the other hand, relies on slow, repeated emotional nudges and controlled exposure to unresolved issues. Growth is painstakingly slow and cannot be rushed. It takes time to develop a strong relationship where a person feels safe enough to challenge old patterns and belief systems. Insights must be practiced repeatedly before they become part of who we are.

Therapy, through weekly sessions and the continual revisiting of core themes, consolidates and deepens this process. This slow phase is often frowned upon in a society where “faster” is assumed to mean “better”.

It is misleading to say that psychedelics work faster than psychotherapy. Yes, the openness, catharsis, and insights feel dramatic when compared with regular therapy, but those transient and extraordinary psychedelic states need to be converted into enduring psychological traits. In other words, experience shows that to ensure the jewels gathered in psychedelic sessions aren’t lost, we must develop the necessary structures to help them take root in our lives. This is why, like other experts in the field, I emphasize the importance of preparation and integration as absolutely essential parts of any healing psychedelic process.

Complementary, Not Better

So, how do psychedelics heal? As I explain to my clients, this is not an either/or dilemma but a both/and integration. The change mechanisms of psychotherapy and psychedelics alike foster openness, enhance plasticity, reduce reactivity, facilitate insight, help complete unfinished emotional business, generate new narratives, strengthen agency and responsibility, and expand—or decenter—the sense of self.

Both rely on the same healing principles: psychedelics amplify; psychotherapy stabilizes. Together, they create a more complete path to transformation.

Beyond Psychology

Before ending, it’s worth remembering that it is in the modern West that psychedelics are seen almost exclusively as therapeutic tools, as “psychedelic-assisted therapy”. In contrast, shamanic traditions, which have worked with sacred plants for millennia, the concept of healing includes and transcends the psychological. There, psychedelics are seen as wise teachers in the broadest sense of the word. In my work, I try to honor both approaches.

The West could learn much from these ancient traditions—if only we approach them with respect and humility, but that is a topic for another article…


  1. You’ve probably guessed from the title that this article is ambitious, thus a bit longer than others. Please note that every claim is backed by scientific research, but to avoid making it even longer, I’ve left out the references. If you’re curious, just reach out — I’ll be glad to oblige. ↩︎
  2. Many may question this assertion; however, there is solid evidence that the average therapy client ends up doing better than about 75% of comparable people who receive no treatment. See https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/921048/ ↩︎
  3. Making the unconscious conscious, reworking old relationship patterns, strengthening the ego, through a corrective emotional experience, catharsis, replacing unhealthy beliefs, taking responsibility, bringing closure to unfinished emotional business, self-transcending egoic patterns, etc. All of these have been advanced as reasons why therapy heals. ↩︎
  4. Of course, beyond these, there are many other alleged factors, but these are generally agreed upon. ↩︎

Monthly NEwsletter

Stay Up To Date .

Subscribe to stay informed of new articles.